The 2004 Annual Meeting (January 14-20, 2004) of OASYS_NEW

Not yet assigned to a slot - 12:00 AM

Effect of Schwann Cells and Donor Antigen on Regeneration Across Long Nerve Allografts

Brenner MJ1, Lowe JB1, Mackinnon SE1, Darcy MD2, Duncan JR1, Fox IK1, Hunter DA1, and Wood PM1. (1) Division of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, Suite 17424 East Pavilion, One Barnes Jewish Hospital Plaza, St. Louis, MO, USA, (2) Department of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, 510 S. Kingshighway, St. Louis, MO, USA

Introduction: Clinical application of nerve allotransplantation has avoided limb amputation in human subjects and proven effective in restoring function. However, due to the morbidity associated with nonspecific immunosuppression, this approach has been limited to patients with unusually severe peripheral nerve injuries. Development of less morbid anti-rejection therapies would broaden the indications for nerve allotransplantation.

Methods: Eight haplotyped miniature swine were enrolled in the study. Ulnar nerve allografts were harvested from donor animals and cold preserved at 4º Celsius in University of Wisconsin solution. At time of donor nerve harvest, experimental animals underwent systemic portal venous infusion of UV-B irradiated donor antigen under fluoroscopic guidance. At 1 week after portal infusion, 5 cm cold preserved nerve allografts were injected with isogeneic Schwann cells or saline and microsurgically transplanted into an ulnar nerve defect.  Serial mixed lymphocyte reaction assays tracked changes in immunoreactivity over time, and grafted nerves were harvested at 20 weeks. 

Results: Histomorphometry showed marked enhancement in nerve regeneration across allografts injected with Schwann cells but no effect of donor portal infusion of UV-B donor antigen (see table below), although suppression of recipient alloimmune response was observed with donor antigen in immunologic assays. Mean fiber counts were 9194 ± 406 in nerves injected with Schwann cells versus 3924 ± 932 in nerves injected with saline (p<0.05), and percent nerve was 6.4 ± 3.0with Schwann cells versus 2.6 ± .53 with saline (p<0.05).

Conclusion: Schwann cell injection significantly enhances nerve regeneration across cold preserved peripheral nerve allografts.

 

Schwann Cells

Donor Antigen

Fiber Count

Percent Nerve

Fiber Width

Nerve Density

Fiber Areas

Percent Debris

Yes

No

13569

9.64

2.74

10527

4813

0.63

Yes

Yes

9974

7.80

3.72

5013

3890

0.92

Yes

Yes

9489

5.48

3.12

5273

2732

2.21

Yes

Yes

3749

2.66

2.75

2927

1326

3.50

No

No

4790

3.07

2.73

3429

1533

0.72

No

Yes

3605

1.91

2.59

2506

954

2.34

No

Yes

2755

2.44

2.96

2607

1217

1.03

No

Yes

4549

2.96

2.88

3108

1475

1.06