Yan YH1, Dzwierzynski WW1, Yan JG1, Matloub HS1, Sanger JR1, Zhang LL1, Godat D1, and Abu-Hajir M2. (1) Department of Plastic Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, 9200 W. Wisconsin Avenue, Milwaukee, WI, USA, (2) Department of Neoplastic Disease (Hematology), Medical College of Wisconsin, 9200 West Wisconsin Avenue, Milwaukee, WI, USA
INTRODUCTION:
Systemic heparin is used to decrease the failure rate of finger replantation
after severe hand crush injuries; however, risks include bleeding, difficulty
in controlling dosage, and possible ineffectiveness. Low molecular weight
heparin (enoxaparin) is a possible safer alternate. This study tested local and systemic
enoxaparin in vascular crush injuries.
MATERIALS &
METHOD: Four groups of 10 SD male rats, 250-300g each, were anesthetized; a
4-cm segment of tail artery was exposed, and a 1-cm segment was crushed by two
needle holders and clamped for 60 minutes. The clamp was then released and the
skin closed. Group 1.
Control (C): These rats received no further treatment. Group 2. Local Enoxaparin (LE): 3 hours after crush, 0.3 ml of enoxaparin
(0.5mg/100g weight, 5mg/ml solution) was subcutaneously injected in the tail; a
second injection was given at 24 hours. Group 3.
Local Heparin (LH): 3 hours
after crush, 0.25 ml of heparin (15 units/100g weight,
200 units/ml solution,) was subcutaneously injected in the tail; a second
injection was given at 24 hours. Group 4.
Systemic Enoxaparin (SE): 3 hours after crush, 0.6 ml of enoxaparin
(1mg/100g weight, 5mg/ml solution) was injected intraperitoneally; a second
injection was given at 24 hours. At 48
hours, all rats were re-anesthetized for evaluation of vascular patency. Patency
evaluation was performed by vascular appearance, arterial milk test,
bleeding at the cut distal end of the artery, and measurement of artery
diameter. Histological studies (H&E)
were performed on the arterial segments, and lumen diameter was measured by
computer imaging system. PTT (partial thromboplastin time) was taken before
surgery and at 48 hours. Statistical analysis was performed.
RESULTS:
|
Control
(C)
|
Local
Enoxaparin (LE)
|
Local
Heparin
(LH)
|
Systemic
Enoxaparin
(SE)
|
Arterial
patency
|
10% (1)
|
100%
(10)*
|
100%
(10)*
|
60%
(6)
|
Arterial
diameter (before crush)
|
0.70
mm
|
0.
70 mm
|
0.70
mm
|
0.7
mm
|
Arterial
diameter (48 hrs)
|
0.4 mm
|
0.69
mm
|
0.46
mm
|
0.65
|
Diameter
decrease
|
0.3
mm
|
0.01
mm**
|
0.24
mm
|
0.05*
|
PTT
(sec.)
|
22
|
22
|
|
** (P<0.001);
*(P< 0.01) (F
test).
There was no change in the PTT in LE and LH before surgery
and 48 hrs later.
CONCLUSION: 1.
Local enoxaparin application provides effective anticoagulation in this
vascular crush injury model; 2. Local enoxaparin was superior to systemic
enoxaparin with lower dosage and no systemic bleeding; 3. Local enoxaparin use
resulted in decreased vasoconstriction, possibly due to the local
anti-spasmodic effect.